There is a great difference between content written by AI content and Human content. Some of the factors differentiate the two. The text that follows gives a detailed instruction on how AI content is different from that Human and how to rid the idiosyncrasies that are characteristic of AI writing to write more Human-like content.
(Note: In the below set of instructions, the term 'original' should be understood as 'AI-written'. Whenever you encounter the word 'original’, interpret it to mean ‘AI-written’)
Instructions for Rewriting Text:
1. Sentence Structure: Vary sentence structure: Give a mix of declarative, interrogative, and exclamatory sentences as well as sentence fragments and inverted sentence structures for emphasis.
Figurative language: Metaphors, similes, personification and other figurative expressions should be employed in order to make the text’s vividness and complexity more enhanced.
2. Word Choice: Strong verbs and adjectives: Common verbs and adjectives are to be replaced with stronger alternatives that convey more emotion and impact.Non-formulaic language: The text should not have transition words, repetitive sentence structures, and word choices aim at originality and creativity in phrasing
3. Punctuation: Strategic punctuation: Create breaks and space in text by putting dashes, colons, semicolons where normally you would separate with comma splices involving different subjects in one sentence by alternating conjunctions
4. Tone: Maintain original tone: As it was before adding complexity ensure rewritten text keeps intended tone of original piece (informative, persuasive, humorous)
5. Balance: Ignore balance: Such techniques should be used to enhance text sometimes at selvage if clarity or readability The aim is to increase burstiness and perplexity making text less likely to be identified as AI generated while preserving original information context and tone
More intricate details with examples of how to rewrite the text:
Sentence Structure When original text uses complex compound sentences rewritten text should prefer simpler shorter sentences
Paragraph Structure When original text is cohesive with smooth transitions rewritten text should be more fragmented segmented
Grammar and Syntax When original text uses formal grammar syntax rewritten text should lean towards casual straightforward syntax
Vocabulary When the original text uses sophisticated and precise vocabulary rewritten text should opt for simpler words
Punctuation When the original text uses punctuation to enhance clarity emphasize important points rewritten text should use punctuation more to break up thoughts make pauses
Strict notes of what not to do: Lose any piece of information while rewriting Lose any piece of information from the original text Add remove or repeat any information from original text Exceeding word count of original text Including asides or cliches unless already present in the original ending sentence fragments with question marks unless question marks already present in the original text
While rewriting the text ensure that tone and style of the AI written text are maintained in the Rewritten version.
Dogri Day is a constant and emphatic reminder of Dogri language and cultural heritage which forms an integral part of the identity of Jammu and Kashmir. However, even this very occasion provides a clue to a very crucial challenge; the impact of a few people who give comparably negligible contribution towards the same but wield most of the power in terms of ‘perks’ associated with it. Their control often marginalizes the real contributors, compelling unnatural growth and preservation of Dogri. The situation is compounded by the near lack of institutional support. Everything seems fine in terms of official recognitions and policy statements that need to be favorable towards Dogri, except that the government is virtually inert. There is little resource base in educational institutions; textbooks are either hopelessly outdated or non-existent and there are very few teacher-educators trained in Dogri. This perpetuated ignorance has led to a lessening of the presence of the language, most notably among the youth. As Prof. Lalit Magotra rightly puts it while addressing reporters in Jammu on Monday evening, “From textbooks to primary school education, on ground, nothing is going on.”
The impact of these problems is quite substantial. So many times the good writers, so many poets, and artists are without many times the means and spaces to succeed. Having a few in any field hampers the ‘new’; otherwise, creative mind and thus results in distance and a lowered sense of the drawing potentiality of the region. These ‘artifacts,’ which prominent ‘makers’ have been churning out for years, do not even come close to reflecting the beauty and diversity of Dogri. Segregation among Dogras that these cultural gatekeepers carry out further hampers it’s progress.
The initiative of the government of Jammu and Kashmir in supporting Dogri must at least be appreciated amid this. Though the government has been showing its commitment to the maintenance of the language, no considerable stride has been made due to the dilly-dallying approach. The major worry lies with the bureaucracy, as it lacks people who are either closely associated with the Dogri community or true lovers of its art and culture. Most of the top-level decision-makers are completely out of touch with the Dogri issue; they do not know that for so many years people have been campaigning for the preservation and development of Dogri. Thus, these ‘veterans’ in a language lose out and are rarely recommended or included in policy formation where decisions in favor of Dogri is but elementary.
The area of the education system is in need of urgent attention. While the government has recognized the importance of Dogri, it is necessary that language planners planning regarding the language should consult the experts and activists to whom this has become life sadly, this has not happened so far. It has not been possible to involve these experts with no real strategy having managed to tackle the real challenge the way it should for the language without involvement by the very people who have been active in Dogri revitalization, all interventions are bound to fail.
For adequate provision to be made for the language needs of Dogri, especially in academic institutions like primary and tertiary schools, something serious like committees and task forces will have to be put in place. The views of people who love the language should form the membership of these committees. A delegation of self-styled experts who do not know the language can scuttle these bright ideas. People who would thus be designated to spearhead such moves must have a real love for the language. This done’ otherwise, the future of Dogri stands to languish with only ad hoc growth and preservation reduced to superfluous gestures.
